#WINRAR VS WINZIP SOFTWARE#In specific geographical markets, downloading PeaZip can be a very slow process, but the software does have 2 mirrors to work around this. PeaZip is only available for Windows and Linux. #WINRAR VS WINZIP ARCHIVE#PeaZip also supports several strong encryption standards.This open source software is extremely versatile, and is able to compress, convert, split and encrypt each of the archive types it supports. #WINRAR VS WINZIP ZIP#More than 150 file types are supported by PeaZip, including 7Zip, RAR, ZIP and TAR. Mac and Linux users will be disappointed to learn that jZip is only available for Windows and Vista. Multiple languages are supported, including English, Chinese and Spanish. Sporting an elegant design, jZip’s interface is remarkably intuitive. jZip has a high level of usability and compresses software swiftly. It can even create, extract and open 7Zip files, as well as supporting other archive formats such as RAR, ISO, Zip, TAR and GZip. Luckily, there’s plenty of other quality freeware available.ĭue to being based on the same technology, jZip is largely seen as an alternative to 7Zip. Although 7Zip is a free alternative, it’s not to everyone’s liking. As good as WinZip and WinRAR are, some users refuse to buy them on principle. Most people could do with a little extra space on their hard drive, but not everyone wants to have to pay for a zipping tool. Depends on your file compression and decompression needs are, a combination of either 7-zip and WinRAR or 7-Zip and WinZip might be sufficient.Most people use Winzip or WinRAR to compress files, but there are many alternatives that can do all sorts of crazy compressing operating even generating CAB files or super-compress files The final file size for the proprietary format is similar across the board: 88 MB for WinRAR, 88.6 MB for 7-Zip and 85.9 MB for WinZip.Īs an open source product, 7-zip provides a decent compression similar to its commercial counterparts at the expense of speed. 7-Zip finished the same task at almost double the amount of time (2 minutes 25 seconds). Despite being the fastest, 7-Zip offers slightly better compression (92.5 MB) compared to both WinZip and WinRar (93 MB each).įor the propriety format, WinRAR claims the top spot (1 minute and 3 seconds) followed closely by WinZip at 1 minute 10 seconds. Finally, the highest compression level available was used.įor the zip compression, WinZip is the fastest at 14.5 seconds followed by WinRAR (21.2 seconds) and 7-Zip (2 minutes and 19 seconds). The following results are the average time and file size produced. The tests were performed three times with restart between each round. The compression file format tested were zip (readable by any compression tools) and proprietary format (vendor’s specific). The compression method ranges from Store to Best (for the most compressed). #WINRAR VS WINZIP RAR#There are two archive formats available: RAR and ZIP. In a similar fashion to WinZip, WinRAR has also retained the familiar interface. This feature is not available in both 7-Zip and WinRAR. At the end of the compression process, a summary with graph is displayed. The compression types are Optimize for best compression (only for newer version of WinZip) and Legacy Compression. The only thing to be aware of is the optional Google Toolbar during the setup. It still offers Classic and Wizard style for managing compressed files. The WinZip interface has not changed much since the initial release. There are settings like Word size, dictionary size, etc for advanced compression. The supported archive formats are zip, 7-zip and Tar. It offers three type of compression: Store, Fastest, Fast, Normal, Maximum, and Ultra being the highest. The 108 MB sample test files comprised of Adobe Acrobat, JPG, Excel, PowerPoint, Word, MP3, Text, MOV and Word 2007. The tests were performed on an Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 2 GHz laptop with 1 GB of RAM running Windows XP Service Pack 3 with latest security updates and patches applied. In this test, we benchmarked 7-zip, WinZip, and WinRAR. Please note, for mp3 and AVI or QuickTime files, there might not be a reduction of file size as they are already in compressed state. It is still interesting to see how well this file compression tools performed with large movies, music and document files. #WINRAR VS WINZIP DOWNLOAD#However, they are still great for software distribution – especially when exe download is not available. Nowadays, with large size of hard drive and fast Internet connection, the file compression tools might not be relevant. In 2000, 7-Zip was released as an open source product. Both of them are commercial shareware products. Back in the 1990s, WinZip and WinRAR are two of the most popular file compression tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |